Link to Techradar.pro review by Ali Jennings: https://www.techradar.com/reviews/cel-uk-roboxpro

This review included extensive testing and real world use as well as the standardised Autodesk FDM test protocol. The results for each head type are shown below along with a link to the test procedure.

“Feature-packed 3D printing for professionals” – Techradar.pro 2019

Ali writes:

5 Stars

QuickFill Head

0/30
RoboxPRO QuickFill
0/5
Dimensional Accuracy
0/5
Fine Flow Control
0/5
Fine Negative Features
0/5
Overhangs
0/5
Bridging
0/2.5
XY resonance
0/2.5
Z-axis alignment

DualMaterial Head

0/30
RoboxPRO DualMaterial
0/5
Dimensional Accuracy
0/5
Fine Flow Control
0/5
Fine Negative Features
0/5
Overhangs
0/5
Bridging
0/2.5
XY resonance
0/2.5
Z-axis alignment

AutoDesk print quality test – FDM Assessment Protocol

https://github.com/kickstarter/kickstarter-autodesk-3d/tree/master/FDM-protocol

Sum the results of each section of the test protocol. The highest possible score is 30, indicating a very well-calibrated system. For reference, a Prusa i3 MK3 scores 22.5 and a Makerbot Replicator 2 scores 18.

0/30
RoboxPRO DualMaterial
0/30
RoboxPRO QuickFill

Check out the Techradar review of RoboxDual here >